Energy management work grounded in operating data
GWT2Energy helps multi-site restaurant and retail operators turn utility data, controls, and day-to-day operating support into practical decisions. These examples show the kinds of problems we solve and how we measure the work—not a promise of what every location will achieve.
Different portfolios require different approaches
Our work can begin with controls, utility bills, procurement, or a specific operating problem. The common thread is portfolio-level visibility with enough site detail to act.
24-location controls and lighting program
GWT2Energy implemented energy management controls and parking-lot LED lighting upgrades across 24 quick-service restaurant locations.
- Automated HVAC scheduling and control
- Exterior-lighting management
- Parking-lot LED lighting upgrades
- Weather-normalized utility-data review
Measured outcome: In 2025, the 24 locations achieved $110,859.68 in calculated electricity cost savings, representing an 18.6% reduction. Because the controls and lighting upgrades were implemented concurrently, the results reflect their combined effect.
Restaurant energy-management program
A restaurant operator needed a consistent way to manage HVAC schedules, overrides, operating issues, and energy performance across a distributed portfolio.
- Portfolio controls and scheduling
- Remote monitoring and operational support
- Utility-data review and exception follow-up
- Performance tracked over time
Measured outcome: Approximately 15% lower energy use across the participating restaurant portfolio over roughly two years, based on utility-bill performance tracking.
Controls and lighting pilot
A retail pilot evaluated how HVAC scheduling, lighting controls, and remote support could improve consistency without disrupting store operations or the customer environment.
- Site assessment and pilot design
- HVAC and lighting control changes
- Utility-bill comparison
- Lessons applied to rollout planning
Measured outcome: Electricity consumption during the first 91 days was 39.4% below the weather-normalized baseline, representing 28,589 kWh in avoided consumption. Annualized, this performance represents approximately 115,000 kWh and $7,800 in projected yearly savings.
Restaurant portfolio strategy
A multi-site operator needed procurement decisions tied more closely to contract timing, market conditions, account data, and the operating realities of individual markets.
- Contract and expiration review
- Supplier competition and pricing analysis
- Portfolio usage and cost context
- Ongoing reporting and decision support
Measured outcome: Approximately $450,000 in cumulative procurement savings over six years, based on documented contract and portfolio cost comparisons.
Results need context
We do not treat one project’s outcome as a benchmark for every client. Building type, operating hours, equipment condition, local utility rates, weather, control settings, and the measures implemented can materially change the result.
Better visibility and clearer operating decisions
The value is not limited to a single savings number. A well-run program can also improve scheduling discipline, reveal billing or equipment exceptions, support budgeting, document project performance, and give facilities and finance teams a shared view of the portfolio.
Examples are provided to illustrate project scope and approach. Outcomes vary based on site conditions, utility rates, operating practices, equipment, implementation scope, and measurement period.
Have a portfolio problem worth measuring?
We can review the available data, define the operating question, and determine whether there is a practical path forward.